South Shore Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Demonstration Project Coastal Hazards Commission

Metadata also available as

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Publication_Date: 20070228
Title:
South Shore Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Demonstration Project Coastal Hazards Commission
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Description:
Abstract:
The data set contains information on coastal structures for eight communities in Massachusetts. The communities are Duxbury, Hull, Hingham, Scituate, Plymouth, Kingston, Marshfield and Hingham. The structures were researched, located and inspected between July and October of 2006. The data includes structure location, ownership, type, material, height, length, condition, repair priority, elevation, FEMA Zone and comments made by the inspector. Also included are estimated repair costs. See <http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/czm/program-areas/stormsmart-coasts/seawall-inventory/> for further information.
Purpose:
Coastal Zone Management sought to identify the capacity of Massachusetts coastal structures to resist major coastal storms and prevent storm damage. In working toward this goal, CZM initiated a program to perform an assessment of Commonwealth owned and/or maintained coastal structures. The first phase of this program was the performance of a demonstration project for coastal structures located on the South Shore. The demonstration project will identify existing structures, their general conditions, ability to provide coastal protection and the probable cost for repairs. The information collected and developed is incorporated into the MassGIS system to allow use for developing a 20 Year Coastal Infrastructure Plan. As this is a demonstration project, it will serve as the basis for development of a statewide inventory and assessment of all Commonwealth coastal structures and the needs for their maintenance and/or repair. Incorporated into this project will be the identification of issues and limitations of the investigation and assessment to achieve the overall goals and what should be included in future investigations/assessments of coastal structures for the other regions.
See <http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/czm/program-areas/stormsmart-coasts/seawall-inventory/> for further information.
Supplemental_Information:
Note 1. The Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management made numerous addendums and corrections to the metadata provided by Bourne Consulting Engineering. Note 2. Cross-referenced citations are applicable to the dataset as a whole.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20060726
Beginning_Time: unknown
Ending_Date: 20061012
Ending_Time: unknown
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -70.935223
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -70.521623
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.310605
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.832199
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: General
Theme_Keyword: Shoreline Protection
Theme_Keyword: Revetment
Theme_Keyword: Groin
Theme_Keyword: Shoreline Structures Assessment
Theme_Keyword: Jetty
Theme_Keyword: Bulkhead
Theme_Keyword: Seawall
Theme_Keyword: Massachusetts Shoreline Structures
Theme_Keyword: Breakwater
Theme_Keyword: South Shore Coastal Hazard
Theme_Keyword: Coastal Infrastructure Inventory
Theme_Keyword: Coastal Zone Management
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: structure, 017
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus:
NASA/Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Earth Science Keywords. Version 8.0.0.0.0
Theme_Keyword:
EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > DATA ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION > GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Theme_Keyword:
EARTH SCIENCE > HUMAN DIMENSIONS > HUMAN SETTLEMENTS > COASTAL AREAS
Theme_Keyword: EARTH SCIENCE > HUMAN DIMENSIONS > INFRASTRUCTURE
Theme_Keyword:
EARTH SCIENCE > LAND SURFACE > GEOMORPHOLOGY > COASTAL LANDFORMS/PROCESSES
Theme_Keyword: EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS COASTAL PROCESSES > EROSION
Theme_Keyword:
EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS COASTAL PROCESSES > SHORELINE DISPLACEMENT
Theme_Keyword: EARTH SCIENCE > OCEANS COASTAL PROCESSES > SHORELINES
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Categories
Theme_Keyword: structure
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: General
Place_Keyword: Gulf Of Maine
Place_Keyword: Massachusetts
Place_Keyword: Norfolk County
Place_Keyword: Plymouth County
Place_Keyword: South Shore
Place_Keyword: Cohasset
Place_Keyword: Marshfield
Place_Keyword: Hull
Place_Keyword: Kingston
Place_Keyword: Plymouth
Place_Keyword: Duxbury
Place_Keyword: Hingham
Place_Keyword: Scituate
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
NASA/Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Earth Science Keywords. Version 8.0.0.0.0
Place_Keyword:
CONTINENT > NORTH AMERICA > UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > MASSACHUSETTS
Place_Keyword: OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN
Place_Keyword: OCEAN > ATLANTIC OCEAN > NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN > GULF OF MAINE
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
Not intended for legal use. Permission is granted to use these data for intended purposes as long as data source and data limitations are included in reproductions. Bourne Consulting Engineering should be acknowledged as the data source on all products derived from these data. The data have not been designed as a navigational aid, and you are not permitted to use them for this purpose. Any party that relies on these data or associated data as accurate does so at their own risk. None of the above-named parties shall be liable for any discrepancies or inaccuracies present within these data or any data associated with the data.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 184 West Central St.
City: Franklin
State_or_Province: Massachusetts
Postal_Code: 02038
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 508-528-8133
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 508-520-6671
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: "Ronald Bourne" ron@bournece.com
Data_Set_Credit:
These spatial data were created for the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) for the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA).
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.2.0.3348
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Publication_Date: 20090706
Title:
Coastal Infrastructure Inventory and Assessment Project Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Office of Waterways
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
The structure numbers are based on the current assessors maps and/or GIS files provided by each town. The year of the oldest structure document was determined by historical permits and/or drawings filed with the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the individual towns. These same files where used to assume the ownership of the structures. There is no guarantee the structure ownership is accurate. The structure length is based on the GPS readings taken at the time of the inspection. See horizontal accuracy. The structure height, ratings, urgency and comments were based on the visual inspection by an engineer at the time of the inspection. These variables were used to estimate the repair costs of the structures using estimated costs of materials and labor. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) zone and elevations were determined from Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) maps distributed by the FEMA. The structure elevations where determined from LIDAR measurements where available.
Logical_Consistency_Report: A Logical Consistency report was not created for these data.
Completeness_Report: A Completeness report was not created for these data.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The structures were located using sub-meter Differential GPS. Cloud coverage, satellite availability and reception interference from buildings or trees decrease the accuracy. Data from the GPS was post processed using Trimble Pathfinder Office software and local GPS stations. This created a one sixth of a meter accuracy on average. The GPS points were overlaid on MassGIS Orthophotography to verify accuracy.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
Structure elevations were determined using LIDAR measurement, where available, provided by the South Shore of Massachusetts, Shore Protection Structures.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: MassGIS
Publication_Date: 20070228
Title: Color Orthoimagery
Other_Citation_Details:
Bourne Consulting Engineering did not record which orthoimagery was used in the creation of these data.
Online_Linkage: <http://www.mass.gov/mgis/>
Type_of_Source_Media: None
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Color Orthoimagery
Source_Contribution: Downloadable Orthophotography
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc.
Publication_Date: 20070228
Title: South Shore of Massachusetts, Shore Protection Structures
Other_Citation_Details:
Bourne Consulting Engineering did not record which LIDAR data were used in the creation of these data.
Type_of_Source_Media: None
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: South Shore of Massachusetts, Shore Protection Structures
Source_Contribution: Shoreline structure LIDAR elevations.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The specific attributes that would be incorporated into the MassGIS system were developed based on the scope of work and the goals to be achieved. The following was established to standardize the data collection and presentation and to allow flexibility for sorting by attributes in the final GIS database. The attributes identified were entered into a MS Access database which was used to manage the data from all eight communities within a single file. The shapefiles were imported into this Personal Geodatabase to maintain integrity and organization of data.
Process_Date: 20070228
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 184 West Central St.
City: Franklin
State_or_Province: Massachusetts
Postal_Code: 02038
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 508-528-8133
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 508-520-6671
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: "Ronald Bourne" ron@bournece.com
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Research was performed on each town to determine the possible location of structures of interest and the historical permits and drawings available. Each structure was then located using Differential GPS and assessed by an engineer. Shapefiles were created for each structure.
Process_Date: 20070228
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 184 West Central St.
City: Franklin
State_or_Province: Massachusetts
Postal_Code: 02038
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 508-528-8133
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 508-520-6671
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: "Ronald Bourne" ron@bournece.com

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: String
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 308

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: NAD 1983 StatePlane Massachusetts Mainland FIPS 2001
Lambert_Conformal_Conic:
Standard_Parallel: 42.68333333333333
Standard_Parallel: 41.71666666666666
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -71.5
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 41.0
False_Easting: 200000.0
False_Northing: 750000.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000000008155898179040834
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000000008155898179040834
Planar_Distance_Units: meter
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: D North American 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 1980
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222101

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: csi_public_south_shore
Entity_Type_Definition:
Mapping and assessing the condition of publicly owned and/or maintained coastal structures.
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: CZM
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ParcelNo
Attribute_Definition:
Community assessor map parcel number in which the structure was in or adjacent to. Where structures extend over several parcels, the structure is referenced to a parcel that is approximately in the center of the structure. Structures that are on Town property, which would otherwise not have a parcel number, are referenced to a parcel that is in the immediate vicinity of the coastal structure.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: OwnerName
Attribute_Definition:
The presumed owner of the structures. As this was for public structures only, the ownership was restricted to the community name, the state agency or the federal agency. The ownership of all structures is presumed as no verification of ownership was performed. Ownership of the structure was determined by research into historic state and federal permits and drawings and the entity indicated on the permits or drawings as the applicant. Where no other information was found the structure was listed at unknown.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: STRUCTUREN
Attribute_Definition:
A unique structure number that was given to each coastal structure. The number was based on an existing numbering systems that include the State Department of Environmental Protection community number followed by the local community assessor's parcel numbering system. The last three digits of the number represents a number assigned to each structure based on denominations of 100, starting at 100 for each structure to allow for multiple structures with the same community, map, block and parcel numbers. Where structures extend over several parcels, the structure is referenced to a parcel that is approximately in the center of the structure. Where Town assessor's references include letters, those are also included within the structure number. Some communities have block numbering within their numbering system and these are included. Communities without block numbering still have the block numbering included but these are illustrated as all zeros for that specific segment. Structures that are on Town property, which would otherwise not have a parcel number, are referenced to a parcel that is in the immediate vicinity of the coastal structure.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: DBID
Attribute_Definition:
A meaningless unique number that is assigned to each structure in order to join the shapefiles and the database. This was performed by joining this attribute to matching ID attribute in the shapefiles.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Database JOIN field. Has no descriptive value.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: OBJECTID
Attribute_Definition:
A unique, not null integer column used to uniquely identify rows in tables in a geodatabase.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ParentID
Attribute_Definition: ObjectID of the feature the attachment is associated with.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Document_N
Attribute_Definition:
A number assigned to each document based on the number assigned to structures. A suffix was added to identify the source of the document: PHO for digital photograph, TWN from a town, DCR for the Department of Conservation and Recreation, COE from the Army Corps of Engineers, LIC from the Department of Environmental Protection and OTH from other sources.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Contract_
Attribute_Definition: Is the contract number listed on the document.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Entity
Attribute_Definition:
The organization or department listed on the document that the document was created by or created for.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Various
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Municipali
Attribute_Definition: Municipality in which the structure is located.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Engineering Consulting
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Cohasset
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Hingham
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Hull
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Kingston
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Marshfield
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Plymouth
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Scituate
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name: Duxbury
Codeset_Source: Bourne Engineering Consultants
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Date_
Attribute_Definition:
The date as listed on the document or when the document was created.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Title
Attribute_Definition: The title on the document.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Sheets
Attribute_Definition: The number of sheets or pages that make up the document.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Location
Attribute_Definition: The location for which the document details.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Descriptio
Attribute_Definition: Description of features.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: YearBuilt
Attribute_Definition:
The year of the oldest document located for the structure. The information is determined from the document research performed on the structure from local, state and federal agencies. If no documents could be found than this entry is denoted as "Unknown". Where documentation of the structure could be found, the date from the oldest document was utilized.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PrimaryTyp
Attribute_Definition:
The type of the primary part of the structure. The structure type was categorized into five basic coastal structure categories which were Bulkhead/Seawall, Revetment, Coastal Beach, Coastal Dune, and Jetty/Groin.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Bulkhead/Seawall
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Revetment
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Coastal Beach
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Coastal Dune
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Groin/Jetty
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PrimaryMat
Attribute_Definition:
The material that the primary structure is constructed of. Either: steel, concrete, stone, wood or sand. The identification of the coastal structure's material of construction was performed and represents the material providing primary protection. Stone structures consisted of both mortared and non-mortared conditions.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Steel
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Concrete
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Stone
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Wood
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Sand
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Town
Attribute_Definition: City or Town name.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Duxbury
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Hull
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Cohasset
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Scituate
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Marshfield
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Hingham
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Kingston
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Plymouth
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: CommunityN
Attribute_Definition:
A community number previously developed for each community in Massachusetts by the Department of Environmental Protection for the Wetlands Protection Act.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 013
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Cohasset
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 018
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Duxbury
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 034
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Hingham
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 035
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Hull
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 037
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Kingston
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 042
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Marshfield
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 057
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Plymouth
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 068
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Scituate
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands Protection Act
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PrimaryCon
Attribute_Definition:
The condition of the primary structure. A preliminary assessment of the condition for each structure was performed by the field teams. This was by visual observation only and no detailed investigation was performed. The condition assessments were based on a predefined five level rating system that ranged from A to F.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: A
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Excellent - Like new condition. Structure expected to withstand major coastal storm without damage. Stable landform (beach, dune or bank). Adequate system exists to provide protection from major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: B
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Good- Structure observed to exhibit very minor problems, superficial in nature. Minor erosion to landform is present. Structure / landform adequate to provide protection from a major coastal storm with no damage. Actions taken to prevent / limit future deterioration and extend life of structure.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: C
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Fair- Structure is sound but may exhibit minor deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure adequate to withstand major coastal storm with little to moderate damage. Actions taken to reinforce structure to provide full protection from major coastal storm and for extending life of structure. Moderate wind or wave damage to landform exists. Landform may not be sufficient to fully protect shoreline during a major coastal storm. Actions taken to provide additional material for full protection and extended life.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: D
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Poor- Structure exhibits advanced levels of deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure has strong risk of significant damage and possible failure during a major coastal storm Structure should be monitored until repairs/reconstruction can be initiated. Actions taken to reconstruct structure to regain full capacity to resist a major coastal storm. Landform eroded, stability threatened. Landform not adequate to provide protection during major coastal storm. Actions taken to recreate landform to adequate limits for full protection from a major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: F
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Critical- Conditions of structure/landform may warrant emergency stabilization as failure may result in potential loss of property and/or life. Landform eroded, loss of integrity. Structure exhibits critical levels of deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure provides little or no protection from a major coastal storm. Actions taken to totally reconstruct structure to regain full capacity. Landform stability is severely compromised, rate of erosion/material loss may be increasing, and landform does not provide adequate protection from a major coastal storm. Actions taken to recreate landform to adequate limits for full protection from a major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: BlockNo
Attribute_Definition:
Community assessor map block number. Communities without block numbering still have the block numbering included but these are illustrated as all zeros, for this attribute.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Community assessor map block number.
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PrimaryUrg
Attribute_Definition:
The perceived immediacy of action to the primary structure and presence of potential risk to the inshore structures if not corrected: I-None- No Inshore Structures or Residential Dwelling Units Present, II-Low Priority- Inshore Structures Present with Limited potential for Significant Infrastructure Damage, III-Moderate Priority- Inshore Structures with potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Limited Residential Dwellings, greater than one dwelling impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline, IV-High Priority- High Value Inshore Structures with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Moderate Density Residential Dwellings, 1-10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline and V-Immediate Priority- Critical Inshore Structures Present with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or High Density Residential Dwellings Conditions of structure may warrant emergency stabilization as failure may result in potential loss of property and/or life, greater than 10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: I
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
None- No Inshore Structures or Residential Dwelling Units Present
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: II
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Low Priority- Inshore Structures Present with Limited potential for Significant Infrastructure Damage
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: III
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Moderate Priority- Inshore Structures with potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Limited Residential Dwellings, greater than 1 dwelling impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: IV
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
High Value Inshore Structures with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Moderate Density Residential Dwellings,1-10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: V
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Immediate Priority- Critical Inshore Structures Present with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or High Density Residential Dwellings Conditions of structure may warrant emergency stabilization as failure may result in potential loss of property and/or life., great then 10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Length
Attribute_Definition:
The estimated structure length in feet. The length of each structure is provided and utilized in the development of the repair/reconstruction costs. The lengths are given to the nearest foot and taken as the linear distance along the structure, as determined by the GPS location, which takes into account structure angles and curvature.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FEMAZone
Attribute_Definition:
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood elevation zone. For each structure the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) were researched for their Flood Zone designation and their Base Flood Elevation from the most recent FIRM maps for the specific Town.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FEMA
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FEMAElev
Attribute_Definition:
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) map elevation in feet NGVD. For each structure the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) were researched for their Flood Zone designation and their Base Flood Elevation from the most recent FIRM maps for the specific Town.
Attribute_Definition_Source: FEMA
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StructNo
Attribute_Definition:
A number assigned to each structure based on denominations of 100, starting at 100 for each structure to allow for multiple structures with the same community, map, block, and parcel numbers.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LocalIdent
Attribute_Definition:
A local geographical identifier of the location of the structure. Based on an adjacent street name, bay, cliff, river, harbor, etc.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineers
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ID
Attribute_Definition:
Internal Feature Number - A meaningless unique number that is assigned to each structure in order to join the shapefiles and the database. This was performed by joining this attribute to the matching DBID attribute in the database.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SecondTyp
Attribute_Definition:
The type of the secondary part of the structure. The structure type was categorized into five basic coastal structure categories which were Bulkhead/Seawall, Revetment, Coastal Beach, Coastal Dune, and Jetty/Groin.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Bulkhead/Seawall
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Revetment
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Coastal Beach
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Coastal Dune
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Jetty/Groin
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StructureI
Attribute_Definition:
A unique structure number that was given to each coastal structure. The number was based on an existing numbering systems that include the State Department of Environmental Protection community number followed by the local community assessor's parcel numbering system. The last three digits of the number represents a number assigned to each structure based on denominations of 100, starting at 100 for each structure to allow for multiple structures with the same community, map, block and parcel numbers. Where structures extend over several parcels, the structure is referenced to a parcel that is approximately in the center of the structure. Where Town assessor's references include letters, those are also included within the structure number. Some communities have block numbering within their numbering system and these are included. Communities without block numbering still have the block numbering included but these are illustrated as all zeros for that specific segment. Structures that are on Town property, which would otherwise not have a parcel number, are referenced to a parcel that is in the immediate vicinity of the coastal structure.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SecondMat
Attribute_Definition:
The material that the secondary structure is constructed of. Either: steel, concrete, stone, wood or sand. The identification of the coastal structure's material of construction was performed and represents the material providing secondary protection. Stone structures consisted of both mortared and non-mortared conditions.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Concrete
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Sand
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Stone
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: n/a
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: MapNo
Attribute_Definition: Community assessor map number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SecondCon
Attribute_Definition:
The condition of the secondary structure. A preliminary assessment of the condition for each structure was performed by the field teams. This was by visual observation only and no detailed investigation was performed. The condition assessments were based on a predefined five level rating system that ranged from A to F.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: A
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Excellent- Like new condition. Structure expected to withstand major coastal storm without damage. Stable landform (beach, dune or bank). Adequate system exists to provide protection from major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: B
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Good- Structure observed to exhibit very minor problems, superficial in nature. Minor erosion to landform is present. Structure / landform adequate to provide protection from a major coastal storm with no damage. Actions taken to prevent / limit future deterioration and extend life of structure.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: C
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Fair- Structure is sound but may exhibit minor deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure adequate to withstand major coastal storm with little to moderate damage. Actions taken to reinforce structure to provide full protection from major coastal storm and for extending life of structure. Moderate wind or wave damage to landform exists. Landform may not be sufficient to fully protect shoreline during a major coastal storm. Actions taken to provide additional material for full protection and extended life.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: D
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Poor- Structure exhibits advanced levels of deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure has strong risk of significant damage and possible failure during a major coastal storm Structure should be monitored until repairs/reconstruction can be initiated. Actions taken to reconstruct structure to regain full capacity to resist a major coastal storm. Landform eroded, stability threatened. Landform not adequate to provide protection during major coastal storm. Actions taken to recreate landform to adequate limits for full protection from a major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: F
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Critical- Conditions of structure/landform may warrant emergency stabilization as failure may result in potential loss of property and/or life. Landform eroded, loss of integrity. Structure exhibits critical levels of deterioration, section loss, cracking, spalling, undermining, and/or scour. Structure provides little or no protection from a major coastal storm. Actions taken to totally reconstruct structure to regain full capacity. Landform stability is severely compromised, rate of erosion/material loss may be increasing, and landform does not provide adequate protection from a major coastal storm. Actions taken to recreate landform to adequate limits for full protection from a major coastal storm.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SecondUrg
Attribute_Definition:
The perceived immediacy of action to the secondary structure and presence of potential risk to the inshore structures if not corrected.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: I
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
None- No Inshore Structures or Residential Dwelling Units Present
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: II
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Low Priority- Inshore Structures Present with Limited potential for Significant Infrastructure Damage
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: III
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Moderate Priority- Inshore Structures with potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Limited Residential Dwellings, greater than 1 dwelling impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: IV
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
High Priority- High Value Inshore Structures with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or Moderate Density Residential Dwellings,1-10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: V
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Immediate Priority- Critical Inshore Structures Present with Potential for Infrastructure Damage and/or High Density Residential Dwellings Conditions of structure may warrant emergency stabilization as failure may result in potential loss of property and/or life., great then 10 dwellings impacted and/or 100 feet of shoreline.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RepairCost
Attribute_Definition:
Estimated costs of repairs to the structure in US dollars. Bulkhead / Seawall Structures, these structures are assumed to be constructed out of concrete, steel, stone or wood with each having its own criteria for establishing costs. For each structure type the following was assumed: Concrete Seawalls - These walls were assumed to be gravity structures with the volume of concrete used based on the bottom width being one-half of the structure height. Costs of construction were based on a per cubic yard estimate that varied from $350 to $630 per cubic yard depending on the structure height. Values for excavation and demolition of existing structure were also included. Stone Seawalls - These walls were treated the same as concrete seawalls and assumed to be gravity structures with the volume of the structure based on the bottom width being one-half of the structure height. Costs of construction were based on a per cubic yard estimate that varied from $350 to $630 per cubic yard depending on the structure height. Values for excavation and demolition of existing structure were also included. Steel Bulkheads - Steel bulkheads were presumed to be constructed with steel sheet piling. Tie back systems were presumed for structures 10 feet or greater in height. Shorter walls were assumed to have a cantilever design. The total depth of sheeting was presumed to be two times the exposed height. The cost for construction varied from $40 per square foot to $60 per square foot plus the cost of excavation and demolition. Timber Bulkheads - Timber bulkheads were presumed to be constructed with timber piles at eight foot on center, horizontal wales and vertical four inch sheathing. The unit costs for installed materials used were $1,500 per pile and $7.50 per bfm. Revetment Structures - Revetment structures were presumed to be constructed of dry placed (no concrete) stone with a two on one slope and a horizontal toe and crown equal to the thickness layer established for each height condition. The total thickness of the revetment layers varied from six to ten feet with the cost of armor and under-layer stone assumed to be $50 per ton and the crushed stone base to be $15 per ton. Groins and Jetties - Groins and jetties were assumed to be the same materials and construction as the revetment structures but would have two sides and therefore double the quantities. Coastal Beaches - Costs for restoration of Coastal beaches presumed the placement of beach renourishment sands at a 1-on-20 slope over the existing beach conditions. The cost for deposition of sand assumed relatively close source of material and utilized $20 per cubic yard for the material installed. Coastal Dunes - Restoration of coastal dunes assumed a cross section of renourished sand with a one-on-four slope on one side of a 25 foot width at the defined dune height. The cost for deposition of sand assumed relatively close source of material and utilized $20 per cubic yard for the material installed. Contingency - A contingency of 20 percent was added to all costs to reflect the unknowns associated with this level of rehabilitation/repair estimating. Engineering and Regulatory Approvals - A ten percent increase to the cost matrix prices was assessed to represent the engineering design and regulatory approval requirements for the restoration of these structures.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: PrimHeight
Attribute_Definition: The estimated visible height of the primary structure in feet.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 5
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 5.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 10
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 10.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 15
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 15.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SecHeight
Attribute_Definition:
The estimated visible height of the secondary structure. Either: Under 5 feet, 5 to 10 feet, 10 to 15 feet or Over 15 feet.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 5
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 5.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 10
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 10.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 15
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 15.01
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: feet
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StructureE
Attribute_Definition:
The elevation of the structure. The elevation of structures was determined in feet from existing information where available. The datum used is NAVD 88 and elevations are to the nearest foot. From a previous study much of the south shore coastal structures had elevations defined based on LIDAR mapping data. Where available structure documentation with elevations was found, in areas with no LIDAR data, the information was included within the structure information. Where there was no LIDAR information or existing documentation, the item has been left blank.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SurveyDate
Attribute_Definition: The date of the survey of the structure.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StructNote
Attribute_Definition:
The engineering team provided a brief description and comment on the structure at the time of the field assessments which is provided in support of the condition rating that was given for the structure.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Description of features.

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800
City: Boston
State_or_Province: MA
Postal_Code: 02114-2138
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 617-626-1200
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 617-626-1240
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: czm@state.ma.us
Hours_of_Service: 0900 hrs to 1600 hrs EST
Contact_Instructions: email only
Resource_Description: web page
Distribution_Liability:
Bourne Consulting Engineering provides this geographic data "as is", and makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy or completeness of the data. al will not be liable in any way for the accuracy of these data, and assumes no responsibility whatsoever for direct, indirect, special, consequential, exemplary, or other damages. The burden for determining the fitness for use of these data resides entirely with the data requestor. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers at Bourne Consulting Engineering, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the use of these data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ESRI Shapefile (.shp)
Format_Version_Number: ArcGIS 8.x, 9.x, and 10.x
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name:
<http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/czm/program-areas/stormsmart-coasts/seawall-inventory/>
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: <http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/map_ol/moris.php>
Access_Instructions: web page
Fees:
GIS and coordinate files may be downloaded at no charge by following links on the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management website (<http://www.mass.gov/czm/>).

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20131004
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bourne Consulting Engineering
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 184 West Central St.
City: Franklin
State_or_Province: Massachusetts
Postal_Code: 02038
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 508-528-8133
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 508-520-6671
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: "Ronald Bourne" ron@bournece.com
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
Public domain data from the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM), an agency of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA), are freely redistributable with proper metadata and source attribution. Please recognize the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management as the source of these data. You are not permitted to use CZM's name or to suggest that CZM endorses your project or product, without its express written consent. While efforts have been made to ensure that these data are accurate and reliable within the state of the art, CZM cannot assume liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by any inaccuracies in the data or as a result of changes to the data caused by system transfers. The user must be aware of data conditions and bear responsibility for the appropriate use of these data with respect to possible errors, original map scale, collection methodology, currency of data, and other conditions specific to these data.

Generated by mp version 2.9.12 on Fri Oct 04 11:48:22 2013